NEW WATERS LISTENER Question
Here's what listener "Dan" had to say:
"I have been challenged by listening to your podcasts. I came across a quote from Simpson that I wonder if you could comment on it. I would be curious to hear your thoughts on the link between social action and the gospel.
Simpson wrote,
'Philanthropic schemes and social reforms are absorbing the interest and enthusiasm of thousands of redeemed men and women who ought to be giving their strength and wealth to do the best things and not the second best. We admit there is something good in these enterprises. They have a place and a value, but let the world take care of them. There are plenty of people to run social reform and temperance societies; plenty of people to fight the political battle. God wants you to give the gospel to the world, to rise to the higher calling, to do the best things.'"
(Simpson quoted by John W. Dahms, "The Social Interest and Concern of A.B. Simpson," p.49) What are the "best things"? https://www.csph.ca/assets/1998-elliot.pdf)
Here’s the response from some of our current and previous cast members:
VIJAY: If we take Simpson’s quote and we simply put it up against a bald, prima-facie reading of the Gospels (the life of Jesus) and Acts (the life of the early church), his categories would not hold up at all! I would suggest that [Simpson] … is forcing a dichotomy that the Gospels … [the] book of Acts and the church for the first 300 years didn’t subscribe to. It wasn’t even a question for them.
ROB: Gospel proclamation and gospel demonstration are complementary, not contradictory. Doesn’t Rodney Stark argue in his book, The Rise of Christianity that the primary reason why the church exploded after AD 250 was the way Christians cared for the sick and dying during the plagues? By his estimation, the number of Christians grew from 1.2 million to 33.8 million.
JOSH: I do also wonder the historical/cultural context of Simpson's comments. There’s got to be something more to them than just a binary dismissal of one form of ministry vs. another.
ROB: Simpson is swinging the pendulum radically to one side of a debate that was emerging in his day. This polarization would ultimately be realized through the great divide between Princetonian fundamentalism and theological liberalism. His comments really need to be understood within this framework. To our misfortune, fundamentalists—and then evangelicals—took up the cause of gospel proclamation while theological liberals took up the cause of gospel demonstration . . . Unfortunately, we have inherited a schism that is not apparent in Scripture. And the polarization is only getting exacerbated by politicizing the difference.
JOSH: I’m sure someone can find another Simpson quote to debunk this one. I also wonder how old he was when he wrote/said that.
DOM: A.B. Simpson was wrong.